Eastern Kentucky
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
200  Charlotte Imer FR 20:19
294  Anna Reddin SR 20:34
347  Julie Mathisen SR 20:41
547  Ashley Svec SR 20:59
582  Ann Tum JR 21:02
688  Ciara Scott SO 21:11
1,008  Madison Zeitz JR 21:35
1,071  Meggan Grams FR 21:40
National Rank #65 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #6 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 4.5%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.2%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 52.4%
Top 10 in Regional 98.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Charlotte Imer Anna Reddin Julie Mathisen Ashley Svec Ann Tum Ciara Scott Madison Zeitz Meggan Grams
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/26 1160 20:56 21:03 21:25 21:44
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/03 949 20:17 20:39 20:53 21:03 21:20 21:40 21:51
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 867 20:13 20:25 20:46 21:03 20:58 21:21 21:54
Ohio Valley Conference Championships 10/31 978 20:45 20:43 20:41 21:02 21:01 21:13 21:35 21:16
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 950 20:17 20:35 21:01 21:22 21:00 21:24 21:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 4.5% 28.0 697 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.4 0.7
Region Championship 100% 5.8 233 0.1 2.9 10.1 39.4 23.2 11.0 6.2 3.4 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Charlotte Imer 5.0% 119.2
Anna Reddin 4.5% 162.8
Julie Mathisen 4.5% 178.7
Ashley Svec 4.5% 210.3
Ann Tum 4.5% 215.3
Ciara Scott 4.5% 230.1
Madison Zeitz 4.5% 246.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Charlotte Imer 25.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.5 4.3 5.0 4.5 4.8 4.0
Anna Reddin 36.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.1 2.2 1.8
Julie Mathisen 42.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Ashley Svec 61.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Ann Tum 64.8 0.1 0.0 0.1
Ciara Scott 75.5 0.0
Madison Zeitz 109.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 2.9% 37.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.8 1.1 3
4 10.1% 33.1% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.3 6.8 3.3 4
5 39.4% 39.4 5
6 23.2% 23.2 6
7 11.0% 11.0 7
8 6.2% 6.2 8
9 3.4% 3.4 9
10 1.8% 1.8 10
11 1.0% 1.0 11
12 0.5% 0.5 12
13 0.3% 0.3 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 4.5% 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.0 95.5 0.1 4.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Michigan 0.2% 1.0 0.0
New Hampshire 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.7
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0